Agency reassures activists after new law removes slaughter ban
12:46 PM CST on Sunday, March 13, 2005
ROSALIA, Kan. – Even in winter, when the Flint Hills are brown and the
ranch hands have to put out alfalfa every few days, the view is pure Marlboro
Country. Mustangs poke over every ridge, and herds graze and romp. It's 50,000 acres of horse heaven, a taxpayer-funded sanctuary for thousands
of unwanted wild horses. In summer, the grass comes up to their bellies, so lush
they can gain 3 pounds a day. For three decades, federal law has protected wild horses, even those too old,
ugly or ornery to get adopted. That changed three months ago, when President Bush signed a massive spending
bill with a provision tacked on by a Montana senator. For the first time in a
generation, the federal Bureau of Land Management has the authority to sell old,
unwanted mustangs – even if the buyer intends to slaughter them. Horse lovers are appalled and outraged. Friendly lawmakers have filed bills
to reverse the new rule. But animal activists fear that Congress won't act
quickly enough to save thousands of these living, whinnying symbols of the Old
West. For all their grace and romance, mustangs compete with cattle, oil and gas
drilling, and suburban growth. Unless buyers willing to care for them are found
soon, 8,400 mustangs could end up at meatpacking plants in Texas or Illinois. Among the horses is No. 2739, an auburn mare put out to pasture on the Shadow
Seven ranch, an hour east of Wichita, Kan. She has a straight back, a lush mane and solid muscles. She eased toward the
ranch truck one recent crisp day, circling it slowly, bold and curious. She was
strutting her stuff, said ranch hand Tim Rogers, hoping someone will take her
home. "Pretty soon she'll have a name and be your friend," he said.
"She wants a ride – but not to the slaughterhouse."
A century ago, 2 million mustangs roamed the American plains. At last count,
there were 37,000 on public lands in 10 Western states. The BLM wants to round
up 9,000 more, saying that's all the land can support. Congress banned the commercial sale and slaughter of wild horses in 1971,
after a Nevadan known as Wild Horse Annie led a crusade with help from legions
of schoolchildren. Since then the BLM has rounded up 203,000 "excess"
mustangs. About 6,000 to 7,000 are adopted each year, but the number in
captivity has climbed steadily. About 24,000 mustangs reside at the Shadow Seven and nine other sanctuaries
on the tall-grass prairies of central Kansas and northeastern Oklahoma, or at a
few short-term holding corrals. Captive mustangs can live 25 years or more, a few years longer than in the
wild. It's an idyllic life, with water and food provided as necessary and
veterinarians on call. The cost to taxpayers runs about $465 per year per horse.
Add in other costs, and the total tab hits $20 million. In December, with no debate or hearings, Sen. Conrad Burns, R-Mont., slipped
an amendment into a federal spending measure giving the government authority to
sell, for any purpose, horses age 10 and older and those that have been put up
for adoption three times. About one in three captive horses is eligible. The economics are plain enough. Ranchers pay the government $1.43 per month
for each head of cattle they graze on public land – a fraction of the $50 they
might pay on private land. Grazing fees brought the BLM $11.8 million last year. Federal law sets aside 261 million acres as public land in the West and says
the land must be shared by livestock, recreation, wildlife, oil and gas
exploration, and wild horses and burros. It's a recipe for conflict, and the BLM
is the referee. "Everybody out there has to make room for others," BLM
spokesman Thomas Gorey said. Cattle outnumber wild horses 100-1 on public land, though six years of
drought have forced the BLM to trim the numbers of both. "It's competition for the last blade of grass on public land. It's been
a fight for 50 years," said Karen Sussman of Lantry, S.D., president of the
International Society for the Protection of Mustangs and Burros, one of dozens
of groups protesting the new rule. She and other horse lovers say the creatures are victims of mismanagement,
misplaced priorities, bad policies and greed. They raise the specter of mustang
burgers and free-range cheval on the menus of Paris and Brussels,
Belgium, where horsemeat doesn't carry a stigma and mad cow scares have fueled
demand. "It's such an outrage," Ms. Sussman said. "The wild horse is
the icon of our American West." Cattlemen point out that wild horses are neither endangered nor native; herds
can be traced to stallions brought to the Americas by Christopher Columbus and
other explorers. Then there are the eating habits: Horses rip grass down to the
dirt, making it slow to recover. And they consume far more per head than cows or
elk because they don't chew their cud. "The horses have exceeded the carrying capacity of the range. That's a
problem," said Preston Wright, president of the Nevada Cattlemen
Association. "We've been complaining about the economic conflict for 30
years." Mr. Wright says he's not thrilled at the thought of slaughtered horses but
blames the BLM, saying the bureau should work harder to find them homes. The
love of horses, he said, "is a very emotional thing. ... But I think it's
something that tends to get manipulated in this debate."
BLM officials say they're doing their best to avert any slaughter. They've appealed to animal rights groups, horse rescue activists and Indian
tribes – anyone who might take large numbers of unwanted horses – and
announced the first sale on March 1. A ranch in southeastern Wyoming bought 200
older mares for $50 each. (The adoption fee is $125.) "We are committed to finding long-term care for these wild horses and
burros," BLM director Kathleen Clarke said. "We are working to place
as many of these animals as we can in good homes." Mr. Burns, a former animal auctioneer, said his amendment's point wasn't to
send horses to slaughter but to save tax dollars and prod the BLM to trim herds
and improve its adoption program. "These animals live in poor conditions
that often lead to their deaths, and without proper management, this will
continue to happen," he said. Horse advocates dispute that. They note that twice as many mustangs roamed
the range when Congress stepped in to protect them in 1971. They blame the
cattle industry's demand for cheap grazing land for the new law. They've staged protests in Nevada and flooded Congress with letters and
calls. Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., has filed legislation to repeal the Burns
amendment, calling it a "quick and dirty fix" that doesn't solve the
ongoing clash of horses and cattle. Last week, volunteers from a dozen horse groups were in Washington to drum up
support for his bill and for another proposal that would ban the slaughter of
any horse, wild or domestic, for meat. It would be hard to overstate their anger at Mr. Burns and the beef industry. "This is horrendous. It's very unsettling," said Texas animal
activist Jennifer Glick of Rowlett. "These animals have been there over 500
years. They're not hurting anyone. Do they deserve to be put into trailers with
no water and sent somewhere to have their throats cut and be skinned and
dismembered?" But the National Cattlemen's Beef Association – the "Beef, it's what's
for dinner" folks – welcomed the Burns legislation as long overdue. "Everything on public lands is about balance. It was never about horses
at the expense of everything else," said Jeff Eisenberg, the association's
director of federal lands. "The horse welfare groups weren't adopting them.
Something had to be done. It was draining the BLM budget."
Two of the nation's three horse slaughterhouses are in North Texas. Despite a
1949 state ban on butchering horses for human consumption, the Texas plants
continue to operate because there is no federal ban, and they sell only to
foreign customers, pet food makers and zoos, processing about 50,000 horses per
year combined. Wild horses could end up at these plants, but officials say they're not
especially in demand. "It's a tougher meat," said John Linebarger, a Fort Worth lawyer
who represents Beltex Corp. in Fort Worth and Dallas Crown in Kaufman. "The
wild horses ... are just not as profitable. They're not as good a horse as the
kind that's been taken care of and grain-fed." The Shadow Seven ranch started taking in wild horses four years ago. "I wouldn't eat one," said Mr. Rogers, 52, the ranch hand who has
spent his adult life there. "Would you eat your dog?" He and a crew of nine care for 3,687 mustangs. Only 369 of them are deemed
adoptable. Few people want an untamed horse older than 5. They're just too
stubborn. Mare No. 2739 is 6 years old. She's a sorrel. Her number is freeze-branded onto her auburn rump. She was
captured in a remote area in central Nevada, the state where more than half of
all wild horses live. Home was a dry, roadless tract almost as big as Rhode
Island. BLM says the area can hold 400 horses, and it's removed about 2,000 in
the last 20 years. Most descend from Pony Express stock, but at the Shadow Seven, No. 2739
mingles with horses caught across the West – paints and Appaloosas, buckskins
and palominos, Andalusians and the offspring of escaped cavalry mounts. A few show the swayed back of old age. Some have homely, mulelike heads. Most
are sturdy, sure-footed and elegant. Groups of half-sisters nibble in a rocky
creek bed. Captured together a thousand miles away, they'll spend retirement
together, for now. "I'd like to keep 'em here and enjoy 'em and feed 'em," said Mr.
Rogers. "But that isn't up to us." Wild Free-Roaming Horse and Burro Act of 1971 "Congress finds and declares that wild free-roaming horses and burros
are living symbols of the historic and pioneer spirit of the West. ... Wild
free-roaming horses and burros shall be protected from capture, branding,
harassment, or death." Burns amendment Allows the sale – for any commercial purpose – of wild horses 10 and
older and those that have been put up for adoption three times. Sen. Conrad
Burns, R-Mont., inserted the provision in a 3,300-page spending bill signed by
President Bush in December. Bills to protect wild horses, both pending in House committees: HR297: The bill would restore the ban on commercial sale and slaughter of
mustangs. Authors: Reps. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., and Ed Whitfield, R-Ky.; 15
co-sponsors. HR503: The American Horse Slaughter Prevention Act would ban horse slaughter
for human consumption nationwide. Author: Rep. John Sweeney, R-N.Y.; 55
co-sponsors. Todd J. Gillman and staff