Fight continues on horse slaughter01/11/2006By SUZANNE GAMBOA / Associated PressThe Bush administration may inspect horse meat on a fee-for-service basis,continuing the slaughter of horses for human consumption, despite votes inCongress last year to try to stop it.The Agriculture Department, responding to petitions from European operatorsof three horse slaughterhouses, told Congress it is considering writingemergency rules to provide the fee-for-service inspections.That has angered some lawmakers who say the department is circumventingCongress' will.The House voted 269-158 and the Senate 69-28 last year to cut off spendingon the salaries and expenses of USDA horse meat inspectors — which themeasure's sponsors say was intended to stop the slaughter of horses. Severallawmakers who sponsored the measure are urging USDA to deny the plants'petition or at least allow time for a public comment period."It was the clear intent of Congress and the only thing discussed on theHouse and Senate floor was the fact that we wanted to stop slaughter," saidRep. Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., one of the sponsors of the measure cutting offfunding. "Congress was very clear in its intent, and the Department ofAgriculture has circumvented that intent."A USDA spokesman, asked for comment, referred to a letter sent to lawmakersstating the agency's position.In that letter, the agency said the amendment "does not prevent horseslaughter at all." Along with Whitfield, amendment sponsors were Sens.Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., John Ensign, R-Nev., and Mary Landrieu, D-La., andReps. John Spratt Jr., D-S.C.., John Sweeney, R-N.Y.Two horse slaughterhouses in Texas and one in Illinois process horse meatlargely for human consumption abroad.Owners of the plant say ending the inspections will eliminate between 182 to222 jobs and cause a total $41 million economic loss annually in thecommunities where the plants are located.The slaughterhouses petitioned the USDA for the new inspection service aboutthree weeks after Bush signed the farm spending bill that included the horseslaughter amendment. The plants also asked the USDA to speed things up bydispensing with soliciting public comment on the proposed inspections."We just asked for them to allow us the same services that have beenavailable to us for some time. We have a history of paying for services withUSDA, like bison," said Jim Bradshaw, lobbyist for the Texas plants. "Wealso pay for all of our overtime, so there's been a process in effect thatallowed us to pay for our services with them."The slaughterhouses want the fee-for-service in place by March 10 on anemergency basis to avoid economic losses. Horse meat processing is a largepart of the Texas plants' operations, Bradshaw said.Fort Worth-based Beltex Corp. and Dallas Crown Inc., based in Kaufman, havecombined payroll of $11 million and spend a combined $6 million on airfreight at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, the plants said in theirpetition.The third plant, Cavel International Inc. based in DeKalb, Ill. paystransportation companies $1.5 million a year to transport livestock and $8million buying livestock. None are publicly traded companies.Michael Markarian, vice president of the Humane Society of the UnitedStates, said the Federal Meat Inspection Act states that horse and othermeat must be inspected by USDA, and the agency must bear the cost."It protects food for export. It would destroy American markets if we senttainted food," Markarian said.The USDA maintains another law allows it to provide, when requested,fee-for-service inspections.Whitfield alleged the USDA has been maneuvering to set up thefee-for-service since a conference committee met to draft a compromise farmspending bill."They're being very precise in doing every thing they can to circumvent theintent of Congress," Whitfield said. But their efforts are helping buildsupport for another bill that bans horse slaughter outright, he said. http://www.dentonrc.com/sharedcontent/APStories/stories/D8F2NR6G3.html