Moved
by appeals to protect the noble horse, the U.S. House (of Representatives)
voted on Thursday to ban the slaughter of horses for food, potentially saving
90,000 animals a year from being served as a delicacy to diners overseas. "Horses
have never been part of the food chain. Horses are not like cattle," said
Kentucky Democrat Ed Whitfield, a prominent backer of the bill, which now goes
to the Senate. Lawmakers
passed the bill 263-146 over the opposition of farm and meat industry groups as
well as the U.S. Agriculture Department. Foes said the bill was a soft-headed
idea that ignored the realities of dealing with unwanted horses. "This
is a piece of legislation that is long overdue," said sponsor John
Sweeney, New York Democrat, tracing efforts back to 1979. He decried horses
being killed so their meat can be sold "as a delicacy, not a
necessity." Three
foreign-owned packing plants -- two in Texas and one in Illinois -- butcher
horses for meat exported for food in Europe. "The concept is repugnant to
most Americans," said West Virginia Democrat Nick Rahall, who challenged his
colleagues, "Explain this to your children." Congress
cut off funding last year for USDA inspection of horse slaughter but the plants
stayed in business by paying for federal inspectors to come to work. Bill
backers said the Senate may consider the bill this fall. Proponents
likened horses to house pets and said horses, which hold an exalted place in
American lore as intelligent companions and long-lived workmates, should not
risk gruesome death in a slaughterhouse. About 90,000 horses a year are sent to
packing plants. The
Humane Society of the United States said horse slaughter "is simply
indefensible and polls show the vast majority of Americans agree." "They
(proponents) are arguing about what happens to the meat" but not assuring
horse welfare, said House Agriculture Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte,
Virginia Republican. If
owners cannot sell unwanted horses, said Goodlatte, they will be abandoned or
"put down" in a pasture or behind a barn, possibly by haphazard
methods. It would cost more than $50 million a year if the government took care
of them, said the Congressional Budget Office. Commerce
Committee Chairman Joe Barton, Texas Republican, said the bill was "an
outright attack on animal agriculture." The
cattle group R-CALF USA said the bill interfered with the rights of horse
owners. "We don't need another layer of federal bureaucracy to intrude on
our daily business decisions," said R-CALF President Chuck Kiker. Lobbyists
for horsepackers said the bill would set a precedent for meddling in veal calf,
hog and poultry barn and poultry slaughter operations.